Mud Jacking: An Effective but Short-Lived Method for Lifting Settled Concrete

  1. The Basics of Mud Jacking
    • A traditional method for lifting settled concrete
    • Injection of liquid concrete through large holes
    • Requirement of heavy mixing equipment (concrete mixer)
  2. Shortcomings and Limitations
    • Vulnerability to dissolution over time due to water exposure
    • The weight-induced settlement, pushing weak soil further down
    • Lack of long-term guarantees from concrete leveling companies
  3. Cost Considerations
    • Relatively low cost compared to foam jacking
    • Additional labor requirements offsetting the cost advantage
Mud Jacking: Lift Settled Concrete | Effective, Short-Lived Solution
Mud Jacking: Lift Settled Concrete | Effective, Short-Lived Solution

Exploring the Limitations of Mud Jacking and Considering Alternatives

Settled concrete can be a frustrating and potentially hazardous issue for property owners. Whether it’s an uneven pathway or a cracked patio, the need to lift and level settled concrete is a common concern. Mud jacking has long been used as a solution for addressing this problem. However, it’s essential to understand the limitations and drawbacks associated with this method.

  1. The Basics of Mud Jacking is a traditional method that involves injecting liquid concrete into the voids beneath settled concrete slabs. This process requires drilling large holes in the concrete and utilizing heavy mixing equipment to prepare the concrete mixture.
  2. Shortcomings and Limitations: Despite its effectiveness in temporarily lifting settled concrete, concrete leveling has several inherent drawbacks. The basic liquid concrete used in the process tends to dissolve over time when exposed to water, leading to potential settling issues in the future. Moreover, the weight of the injected material can further compress weak soil, exacerbating the problem of settlement. It’s important to note that companies offering mud-jacking services cannot provide long-term guarantees due to these limitations.
  3. Cost Considerations: While mud jacking may seem cost-effective compared to alternatives such as foam jacking, there are additional factors to consider. Although the concrete used in mud jacking is relatively inexpensive, the process requires more labor and heavy equipment. This can offset the initial cost advantage and make it comparable to other methods like foam jacking.

Exploring Alternatives: Foam jacking is an alternative method gaining popularity for lifting settled concrete. Unlike mud jacking, foam jacking utilizes an expanding polyurethane foam injected beneath the concrete. The foam expands, fills voids, and lifts the concrete to its desired level. Foam jacking offers advantages such as:

  • Long-lasting results, as the foam does not dissolve with water
  • Lightweight material that minimizes additional settlement risks
  • Potential for extended warranties from reputable foam jacking companies

In conclusion, while mud jacking can be effective in temporarily addressing settled concrete, it has inherent limitations. The dissolution of the liquid concrete over time and the potential for further settlement make it a short-term solution. Homeowners should consider alternatives like foam jacking, which offers longer-lasting results and the potential for extended warranties. Consulting with professionals in the field will help determine the best approach for lifting and leveling settled concrete.

We're Now Open! Call Us For A Free Quote